[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110524215923.GA20138@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:59:23 +0200
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: ETHTOOL_SFEATURES: remove NETIF_F_COMPAT
return
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:39:30PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 11:14:37 +0200
>
> > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:09:58PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> >> > You guys really need to sort this out properly.
> >> > Please resubmit whatever final solution is agreed upon.
> >> I noticed that v2.6.39 was tagged today. We should definitely remove
> >> NETIF_F_COMPAT so it won't bite us in the future. The other patch that
> >> fixes ethtool_ops->set_flags compatibility is a bugfix, so it should go
> >> in - if we decide that the SFEATURES compatibility should be removed
> >> it won't matter.
> >>
> >> Ben, do you agree?
> > Ping?
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95552/
> > (this is a bugfix, so should go to stable)
> >
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/95753/
> > (removes ETHTOOL_F_COMPAT; this we need to decide on)
> You and Ben are still arguing over details.
>
> I want fresh versions of these patches (yes, both of them) once
> all of the issues are resolved.
We could just wait for 2.6.40 and pretend this code part never existed. ;-)
I'll rebase the first patch tomorrow. Without it the compatibility in
ETHTOOL_SFEATURES for non-converted drivers is busted wrt set_flags.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists