[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110526.144416.252997714470172705.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:44:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bruce.w.allan@...el.com
Cc: dmitry@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
difrost.kernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of
sctp_local_addr_free
From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:40:34 -0700
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org] On
>>Behalf Of David Miller
>>Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39 AM
>>To: dmitry@...adcom.com
>>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; difrost.kernel@...il.com
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free
>>
>>
>>This has been fixed for days.
>
> Fixed in net-2.6, yes, but not yet in net-next-2.6
net-next-2.6 is not active and is just a dummy tree for Stephen
Rothwell to pull into -next
You should never be referencing or using net-next-2.6 during the
merge window when new features changes are not being accepted.
Only net-2.6 is active during this time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists