[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1306436821.28745.4.camel@lb-tlvb-dmitry>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:07:01 +0300
From: "Dmitry Kravkov" <dmitry@...adcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: "bruce.w.allan@...el.com" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"difrost.kernel@...il.com" <difrost.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of
sctp_local_addr_free
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:44 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:40:34 -0700
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org] On
> >>Behalf Of David Miller
> >>Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:39 AM
> >>To: dmitry@...adcom.com
> >>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; difrost.kernel@...il.com
> >>Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp compilation failed due to lack of sctp_local_addr_free
> >>
> >>
> >>This has been fixed for days.
> >
> > Fixed in net-2.6, yes, but not yet in net-next-2.6
>
> net-next-2.6 is not active and is just a dummy tree for Stephen
> Rothwell to pull into -next
>
> You should never be referencing or using net-next-2.6 during the
> merge window when new features changes are not being accepted.
> Only net-2.6 is active during this time.
>
Hmm, so how similar will be net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 when re-opened?
You apply a lot of fixes during this time...
And yes, i've hit the compilation error in net-next since i'm using it
as basis for future features submit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists