netdev - Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:50:40 +0200
From:	Bernhard Held <bheld@...i.de>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39

Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell:
> On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
>>> Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
>>> in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge).
>>>
>>> All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses.
>>
>> Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from
>> going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two
>> of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the
>> same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related.
>
> Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter & cc'd to kvm,
> but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to netdev has
> not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped into the
> bit bucket also.
Just another reference 3.5 months ago:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html

Bernhard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html