netdev - Re: [RFC] should we care of COMPAT mode in bridge ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:33:54 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] should we care of COMPAT mode in bridge ?

On Monday 06 June 2011 22:32:32 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> In my case, I used latest bridge-utils tree, but compiled on a RHEL4
> machine :)
> 
> # ls -l /usr/include/linux/sockios.h
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 5369 Mar 18  2002 /usr/include/linux/sockios.h
> # rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/sockios.h
> glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL
> 
> Please note that pretty everything works on this 32bit distro machine,
> but a 64bit kernel.
> 

Ok, that is indeed an excellent reason to make it work.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html