netdev - Re: [RFC] should we care of COMPAT mode in bridge ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:34:03 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] should we care of COMPAT mode in bridge ?

Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 22:31 +0200, Andreas Schwab a écrit :

> OTOH, the SIOCSIFBR and SIOCGIFBR ioctls are obsoleted by the
> SIOCBRADDBR, SIOCBRDELBR, SIOCBRADDIF, SIOCBRDELIF ioctls and bridge
> sysfs files (which have no compat issues).
> 

Yep, unless you are stuck with an old binary :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html