netdev - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_nat: avoid double nat for loopback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DEDF167.1010202@trash.net>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:37:43 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
CC:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_nat: avoid double nat for loopback

On 04.06.2011 16:02, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
> 	Avoid double NAT and seq adjustment for loopback
> traffic because it causes silent repetition of TCP data. One
> example is passive FTP with DNAT rule and difference in the
> length of IP addresses.
> 
> 	This patch adds checks if packet is sent and
> received via loopback device. As the same conntrack is used
> both for outgoing and incoming direction, we restrict NAT,
> seq adjustment and confirmation to happen only in
> outgoing direction (OUTPUT and POSTROUTING).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> ---
> 
> 	As the check is not so cheap, another alternative
> is to add new skb flag, eg. "loopback", that can be set in 
> drivers/net/loopback.c, loopback_xmit(). May be there is space
> for it in flags2?

I don't think we should be adding code specifically needed for netfilter
to the loopback driver if we can avoid it. I don't think we need to
actually avoid calling nf_nat_packet twice, that shouldn't do any harm,
just the sequence number adjustment. So we could add the loopback check
to the IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT case to at least avoid it in some cases.
Would that work or am I missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html