[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110610172747.GA2925@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:27:47 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] net: introduce time stamping wrapper for
netif_rx.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:20:56AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:06:59 +0200
> Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > +static inline int netif_rx_defer(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + if (skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb))
> > + return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
> > + return netif_rx(skb);
> > +}
>
> Obvious question why not just put this in netif_rx.
Well, if a packet gets defered, then that means that the PHY driver
has decided to hold the packet until it obtains the time stamp from
the PHY hardware. Then, the driver delivers the packet using netif_rx.
So, we need to have two methods to deliver a frame, one with and one
without the hook, otherwise you get packets going round in circles.
Take a look at the one PHY driver using this (so far), on line 1017 of
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c, to see how it works.
Thanks,
Richard
PS I did consider at renaming netif_rx to __netif_rx and then
implementing netif_rx as shown above, but I found many, many callers
of netif_rx which are not drivers, so I worry that bad side effects
would appear from such a change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists