[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F001F3820B880E@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:30:48 -0500
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...tstofly.org" <kernel@...tstofly.org>,
"rmallon@...il.com" <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/5] net: ep93xx_eth: pass struct device to DMA API
functions
On Friday, June 10, 2011 9:56 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:40:21PM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed this macro in include/linux/netdevice.h
>>
>> /* Set the sysfs physical device reference for the network logical device
>> * if set prior to registration will cause a symlink during initialization.
>> */
>> #define SET_NETDEV_DEV(net, pdev) ((net)->dev.parent = (pdev))
>>
>> Is there anyway you could use that macro in the probe to save the platform_device
>> (with it's associated device) instead of introducing a new struct device * in the
>> private data?
>
> Nice finding, thanks.
>
> I'll look into that and send new version of the whole series soon.
It looks like after doing this in the probe:
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
You can then pass the required struct device pointer to the DMA API functions
like this:
static int ep93xx_rx(struct net_device *dev, int processed, int budget)
{
...
dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev->dev.parent, ...
Regards,
Hartley--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists