netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] vlan: Fix the ingress VLAN_FLAG_REORDER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinctdoyYJo+sU9qUWV8uZV8yGNdnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:20:29 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pratnakarlx@...il.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	greearb@...delatech.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vlan: Fix the ingress VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR check

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote:
> Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:49:27AM CEST, xiaosuo@...il.com wrote:
>>
>>For hw-accel-vlan-rx, is the headroom for this header expansion
>>reserved? I don't think so. Thanks.
>
> But this wasn't done for hw-accel-vlan-rx previously right? So why don't
> check for hw-accel-vlan-rx and don do unreorder in that case?
>

Yes, it wasn't done before. We want to make the behaviors of
hw-accel-vlan-rx and non-hw-accel-vlan-rx are the same. Is it your
original goal of your vlan-untag patch?

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html