[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110610121241.GE17568@minipsycho.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:12:43 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pratnakarlx@...il.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
greearb@...delatech.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vlan: Fix the ingress VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR check
Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:20:29PM CEST, xiaosuo@...il.com wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:49:27AM CEST, xiaosuo@...il.com wrote:
>>>
>>>For hw-accel-vlan-rx, is the headroom for this header expansion
>>>reserved? I don't think so. Thanks.
>>
>> But this wasn't done for hw-accel-vlan-rx previously right? So why don't
>> check for hw-accel-vlan-rx and don do unreorder in that case?
>>
>
>Yes, it wasn't done before. We want to make the behaviors of
>hw-accel-vlan-rx and non-hw-accel-vlan-rx are the same. Is it your
>original goal of your vlan-untag patch?
You are correct. I just thought that since disabling reordering will be
most likely removed in near future, non-hw-accel-vlan-rx reorder disable
would not be needed.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists