netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 1/2] wireless: Remove casts of void *

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F704307FF7C464F@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:45:07 -0700
From:	Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>
To:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>,
	Jouni Malinen <jmalinen@...eros.com>,
	Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@...eros.com>,
	Senthil Balasubramanian <senthilkumar@...eros.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
	Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/2] wireless: Remove casts of void *

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c
>> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int mwifiex_ret_11n_cfg(struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp, void *data_buf)
>>        struct host_cmd_ds_11n_cfg *htcfg = &resp->params.htcfg;
>>
>>        if (data_buf) {
>> -               tx_cfg = (struct mwifiex_ds_11n_tx_cfg *) data_buf;
>> +               tx_cfg = data_buf;
>>
>> I think pretty useless.  tx_cfg is a struct mwifiex_ds_11n_tx_cfg *.
> 
> True, but IMHO, this documents, particularly in a random snippet like
> this, what's going on. Arguably though, a better fix would be to move
> the cast to the place where this function is called.

Hi Julian,

Thanks for your comment. We will work on this.

Regards,
Bing--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html