netdev - Re: [Security] inet_diag insufficient validation?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1308148524.3718.0.camel@dan>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:35:24 -0400
From:	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
To:	Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...nel.sg>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	security@...nel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Security] inet_diag insufficient validation?

On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 14:55 +0800, Eugene Teo wrote:
> Cc'ed acme.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com> wrote:
> > It seems to me that the auditing performed by inet_diag_bc_audit() is
> > insufficient to prevent pathological INET_DIAG bytecode from doing bad
> > things.
> >
> > Firstly, it's possible to cause an infinite loop in inet_diag_bc_audit()
> > with a INET_DIAG_BC_JMP opcode with a "yes" value of 0.  The valid_cc()
> > function, also called from here, seems suspicious as well.
> >

Any chance of getting this fixed?  I have a reproducer available if
necessary.

-Dan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html