[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1308318315.2780.12.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:45:15 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, therbert@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: rfs: enable RFS before first data packet is
received
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 à 23:38 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:50:46 +0100
>
> > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 04:15 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> @@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> goto discard;
> >>
> >> if (nsk != sk) {
> >> + sock_rps_save_rxhash(nsk, skb->rxhash);
> >> if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
> >> rsk = nsk;
> >> goto reset;
> >>
> >
> > I haven't tried this, but it looks reasonable to me.
> >
> > What about IPv6? The logic in tcp_v6_do_rcv() looks very similar.
>
> Indeed ipv6 side needs the same fix.
>
> Eric please add that part and resubmit. And in fact I might stick
> this into net-2.6 instead of net-next-2.6
>
OK, here is the net-2.6 based one then, thanks !
[PATCH v2] net: rfs: enable RFS before first data packet is received
First packet received on a passive tcp flow is not correctly RFS
steered.
One sock_rps_record_flow() call is missing in inet_accept()
But before that, we also must record rxhash when child socket is setup.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>
---
V2: add ipv6 support, as Ben noticed.
net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 1 +
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 9c19260..eae1f67 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
@@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ int inet_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
lock_sock(sk2);
+ sock_rps_record_flow(sk2);
WARN_ON(!((1 << sk2->sk_state) &
(TCPF_ESTABLISHED | TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT | TCPF_CLOSE)));
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index a7d6671..708dc20 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1589,6 +1589,7 @@ int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
goto discard;
if (nsk != sk) {
+ sock_rps_save_rxhash(nsk, skb->rxhash);
if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
rsk = nsk;
goto reset;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index d1fd287..87551ca 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1644,6 +1644,7 @@ static int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* the new socket..
*/
if(nsk != sk) {
+ sock_rps_save_rxhash(nsk, skb->rxhash);
if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb))
goto reset;
if (opt_skb)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists