netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DFE8B83.3040501@candelatech.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:51:31 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	bhutchings@...arflare.com, mirqus@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.

On 06/19/2011 04:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:58:55 -0700
>
>> It's idle for 11 days.  Seems dead in the water if you ask me.
>
> Because nobody wants to put in the effort to implement it properly.
>
> It's not an excuse for polluting the kernel with extraneous ethtool
> commands just because a fundamental issue is not being worked on.
>
> If this is important to you, you have all the power in the world to
> make it move forward.
>
> Your choice.

The last email in the features thread that I saw was a question to you.

Is the original author's work worth trying to salvage, or should
the next person to attempt this ignore all that and start fresh?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html