netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110619.165456.1382315060825422595.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greearb@...delatech.com
Cc:	bhutchings@...arflare.com, mirqus@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow NICs to pass Frame Checksum up the stack.

From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:51:31 -0700

> The last email in the features thread that I saw was a question to
> you.

I'm frustrated with the author because he keeps submitting what
amounts to schemes that have the same problem or are incredibly ugly,
and it's becomming a waste of my time to continue discussing the
matter.

> Is the original author's work worth trying to salvage, or should
> the next person to attempt this ignore all that and start fresh?

The above should make that obvious.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html