netdev - Re: [PATCH] netlink: advertise incomplete dumps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110620.135929.942453687487758741.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	johannes@...solutions.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	samuel@...tiz.org, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
	linville@...driver.com, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netlink: advertise incomplete dumps

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:40:46 +0200

> Should we merge this through wireless? From wireless-next it'll go into
> net-next quickly, but the converse isn't true, so using it in wireless
> would be harder if it was merged through net-next I think? Or John can
> cherry-pick into wireless-testing?

I'm fine with this going in via the wireless tree, that way we'll
see a real user when it merged into net-next-2.6

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html