[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E01FAD8.6030106@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:23:20 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: ipv4: fix potential memory leak by
assigning uhash_entries
On 11-06-22 01:04 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 21 juin 2011 à 16:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker a écrit :
[...]
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> index abca870..6f53a5a 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> @@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ void udp4_proc_exit(void)
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
>>
>> -static __initdata unsigned long uhash_entries;
>> +static __initdata unsigned long uhash_entries = UDP_HTABLE_SIZE_MIN;
>> static int __init set_uhash_entries(char *str)
>> {
>> if (!str)
>
> Arg no, I really wanted to get more hash slots in my 32bit machines,
> with 4Gbytes of memory.
>
> Here is what I currently have (without your patch)
>
> [ 1.903086] UDP hash table entries: 512 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
>
>
> I mean, this kmemleak was already reported.
Ah, I'd not read that thread - here is the link if anyone else
is following along:
http://lists-archives.org/linux-kernel/27460513-kmemleak-for-mips.html
>
> 32MB machines are things of the past.
>
> If you really care, please add a change to alloc_large_system_hash() ?
Given the user list (dcache.c, inode.c, pid.c, ...) it probably
isn't worth the churn of adding a min argument to the calls.
I'm fine with dropping this patch (and glad I'd CC'd you on it)
Thanks,
Paul.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists