[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E099113.6000801@wpkg.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:30:11 +0200
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: ja@....bg, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bazsi@...abit.hu, hidden@...abit.hu
Subject: Re: what's causing "ip_rt_bug"?
On 28.06.2011 05:55, David Miller wrote:
>> The resulting handling should be:
>>
>> - REJECT TCP:
>> - in INPUT we can provide addr_type = RTN_LOCAL but
>> better allow rejecting traffic delivered with
>> local route (no IP address => use RTN_UNSPEC to
>> allow also RTN_UNICAST).
>> - FORWARD: RTN_UNSPEC => allow RTN_LOCAL/RTN_UNICAST
>> saddr, add fix to ignore RTN_BROADCAST and RTN_MULTICAST
>> - OUTPUT: RTN_UNSPEC
>>
>> - NAT, mangle, ip_queue, nf_ip_reroute: RTN_UNSPEC in LOCAL_OUT
>>
>> - IPVS:
>> - use RTN_LOCAL in LOCAL_OUT and FORWARD after SNAT
>> to restrict saddr to be local
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov<ja@....bg>
>
> Unless someone gives some negative feedback soon I'm going to
> apply this.
Can you tell me where it will be pushed?
I.e. 3.x kernels only, or does it have a chance to go into 2.6.39.x?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists