netdev - Re: [PATCH] sctp: ABORT if receive queue is not empty while closing socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110630161938.GD24074@canuck.infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:19:38 -0400
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org>
To:	Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: ABORT if receive queue is not empty while closing
 socket

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:11:06AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 09:31 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:14:41PM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> >> Right.  The lack of ABORT from the receive of data is a bug.  I was trying to point out
> >> that instead of modified the sender of data to send the ABORT, you modify the receiver
> >> to send the ABORT when it is being closed while having data queued.
> > 
> > Is this what you had in mind?
> 
> Almost.  It could really be a simple true/false condition about recvqueue or inqueue
> being non-empty.  If that's the case, trigger abort.

What would be the advantage of that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html