lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:19:38 -0400 From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org> To: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>, Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: ABORT if receive queue is not empty while closing socket On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:11:06AM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > On 06/30/2011 09:31 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:14:41PM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > >> Right. The lack of ABORT from the receive of data is a bug. I was trying to point out > >> that instead of modified the sender of data to send the ABORT, you modify the receiver > >> to send the ABORT when it is being closed while having data queued. > > > > Is this what you had in mind? > > Almost. It could really be a simple true/false condition about recvqueue or inqueue > being non-empty. If that's the case, trigger abort. What would be the advantage of that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists