[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309449922.4561.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:05:22 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/4 net-next] vhost: vhost TX zero-copy support
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:13 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Assuming you mean vhost_zerocopy_signal_used, here's how I would do
> it:
> add a kref and a completion, signal completion in kref_put
> callback, when backend is set - kref_get, on cleanup,
> kref_put and then wait_for_completion_interruptible.
> Where's the need for another thread coming from?
>
> If you like, post a patch with busywait + a FIXME comment,
> and I can write up a patch on top.
>
> (BTW, ideally the function that does the signalling should be
> in core networking bits so that it's still around
> even if the vhost module gets removed).
OK, I will modify the patch.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists