[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309896081.18925.73.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:01:20 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
Cc: Sathya.Perla@...lex.Com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: coding style question on indentation
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 13:54 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 09:23 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I think this better:
> > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
> > 12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
> > dma_unmap_page(&adapter->pdev->dev, dma_unmap_addr(rx_page_info, bus),
> > adapter->big_page_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > maximally fill to 80 cols, then wrap with maximal tabs using spaces
> > if necessary to align args after opening parenthesis.
> > In this case, 2 tabs, 7 spaces.
> I think the most flexible is to use hard tabs to align the continued
> line to the same level of indentation as the parent line, then use
> spaces for "pretty" alignment. That way, it all lines up regardless of
> how many spaces the viewer has set for the equivalent size of hard tabs.
True, but none of the common editing tools do this.
You could produce and publish emacs/vi modes for this
and then teach checkpatch to understand this mode and
not complain about the spacing if it matters that much
to you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists