[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1310224033.26989.20.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 08:07:12 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@...escale.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sandeep Gopalpet <sandeep.kumar@...escale.com>,
Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@...escale.com>,
Gridish Shlomi-RM96313 <RM96313@...escale.com>,
Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 37/72] fsl_*/gianfar*/ucc_*: Move the Freescale drivers
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 08:39 -0700, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Jeff Kirsher
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
> > Move the Freescale driver into drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ and
> > make the necessary Kconfig and Makefile changes.
>
> I don't have an actual objection to this, but I just don't understand
> why it's necessary. Is this a new trend for drivers/net, to have all
> drivers grouped by manufacturer? Or is there something special about
> Freescale?
>
What we are trying to do is better organize the drivers/net directory
structure. So I am placing all the Ethernet drivers in
drivers/net/ethernet/ and so on. Under drivers/net/ethernet/, I have
tried to organize drivers by the most appropriate way to help in
maintaining the drivers, a lot of the time it tended to be by
manufacturer. It made sense to group all the Freescale drivers into a
common directory so that it would be easier to maintain.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists