lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:54:01 +0200
From:	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
	kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] net: remove NETIF_F_ALL_TX_OFFLOADS

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:43:14PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 02:10:29 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > There is no software fallback implemented for SCTP or FCoE checksumming,
> > and so it should not be passed on by software devices like bridge or bonding.
> > 
> > For VLAN devices, this is different. First, the driver for underlying device
> > should be prepared to get offloaded packets even when the feature is disabled
> > (especially if it advertises it in vlan_features). Second, devices under
> > VLANs do not get replaced without tearing down the VLAN first.
> > 
> > This fixes a mess I accidentally introduced while converting bonding to
> > ndo_fix_features.
> > 
> > NETIF_F_SOFT_FEATURES are removed from BOND_VLAN_FEATURES because they
> > are unused as of commit 712ae51afd.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> 
> This is not the answer.
> 
> We have to implement software fallbacks for the checksum offloads.
> 
> That is easier than having this ever growing set of exceptions for
> feature bit propagation, which at best will end up being a steaming
> pile of unmaintainable poo.

I agree about the fallbacks, but this patch is about fixing a regression
that's going to hit 3.0. Now all bonding devices always advertise e.g.
SCTP_CSUM. Sorry if I was unclear about this.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ