netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/10] enable SKB paged fragment lifetime visibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1310744163.20648.21.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:36:03 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/10] enable SKB paged fragment lifetime visibility

On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:17 +0100, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:06:46 +0100
> 
> > What is the general feeling regarding this approach?
> 
> Not bad,

Thanks, I'll continue in this direction then.

>  I like that only the users of destructors pay the price of
> the extra atomics.

Yes, I very much wanted to avoid hitting everyone with extra overhead.

> Like you say in patch #8, I wouldn't bother adding a whole new
> ->sendpage_destructor() OP, just add the new argument to the existing
> method.

Will do.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html