netdev - Re: [patch] skbuff: use kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110720080109.GH6445@shale.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:01:09 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
	"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] skbuff: use kfree_skb() instead of kfree()

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> > Crap.  Sorry, I shouldn't have sent that.  We shouldn't return the
> > freed "n" here.  I'll send a v2 shortly.
> 
> Also, dont forget to say its a patch for net-next-2.6

If you're using linux-next, is there a way to tell which tree a
patch came from?  Obviously in this case it's core networking, but
in other cases how does that work?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html