[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311150084.2338.3.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:21:24 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc: Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] skbuff: use kfree_skb() instead of kfree()
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 11:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> > > Crap. Sorry, I shouldn't have sent that. We shouldn't return the
> > > freed "n" here. I'll send a v2 shortly.
> >
> > Also, dont forget to say its a patch for net-next-2.6
>
> If you're using linux-next, is there a way to tell which tree a
> patch came from? Obviously in this case it's core networking, but
> in other cases how does that work?
In this particular case, David will know for sure since patch is very
recent, but I wanted to make a general advice.
Keep in mind David has to review dozens of patches _per_ day, so netdev
related patches need some extra cooperation from submitters to help the
maintainer.
This extra cooperation means to test the patch on either net-next-2.6 or
net-2.6 tree ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists