netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/13] enable SKB paged fragment lifetime visibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:18:16 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/13] enable SKB paged fragment lifetime
 visibility

On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 15:13 +0100, David Miller wrote:
> Well, Ian, because you put all of these "struct page *" MM layer
> const changes in here I can't just apply this series once you
> get it ready enough from a networking perspective.
> 
> Why not do the const crap later, so it can be done independently
> of these changes and not be a dependency upon them?

Initially it was to help me find locations which needed consideration
(since it caused build failures) but I can flip it round now, sure.

> I know you want to pass const page structs down as far as possible,
> but that can wait for later, make the networking bits work on
> non-const pointers for now.

Will do.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html