[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110726124222.GA4842@mtldesk30>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:42:22 +0300
From: Eli Cohen <eli@....mellanox.co.il>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: invalid requirement from ethtool?
Hi,
I see the following text in include/linux/ethtool.h and wonder what is
the reasoning for requiring that both params cannot be zero. I could
not track when and who inserted this text as it dates before git was
used to track kernel code, but my feeling is that is related to a
specific hardware limitation.
/* How many packets to delay an RX interrupt after
* a packet arrives. If 0, only rx_coalesce_usecs is
* used. It is illegal to set both usecs and max frames
* to zero as this would cause RX interrupts to never be
* generated.
*/
__u32 rx_max_coalesced_frames;
/* How many packets to delay a TX interrupt after
* a packet is sent. If 0, only tx_coalesce_usecs is
* used. It is illegal to set both usecs and max frames
* to zero as this would cause TX interrupts to never be
* generated.
*/
__u32 tx_max_coalesced_frames;
I found this in tg3 driver:
/* No rx interrupts will be generated if both are zero */
if ((ec->rx_coalesce_usecs == 0) &&
(ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames == 0))
return -EINVAL;
However, bnx2 for example allows setting both to zero.
I think both params zero should be allowed and mean coalescing is not
operational, thus we can remove these comments from ethtool.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists