lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACLa4pvJ2+eTRf3SRzoXgiW8H+U=BDH-2DKVZ7pGRrPem=JYgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:58:04 -0400
From:	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:	anton@...ba.org, casey@...aufler-ca.com, mjt@....msk.ru,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Fix security_socket_sendmsg() bypass problem.

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:

> Does SELinux want to receive nosec flag at selinux_socket_sendmsg() because
> calling security_socket_sendmsg() more than once is meaningless for SELinux?

SELinux would not mind having a flag such that we could expedite the
call on the 2nd or later.  Did we finally find the first place where
SELinux is going to be the faster LSM!  Never thought I'd see the day!

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ