netdev - Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110810183016.GY4926@sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:30:16 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Cc:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree
 binding.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
> >>> -	This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
> >>> -	the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
> >>> -	(driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock. The selected clock
> >>> -	is the one fed to the prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock).
> >>> -	The PRESDIV field of CTRL(control register) controls a prescaler that
> >>> -	generates the Serial Clock (Sclock), whose period defines the
> >>> -	time quantum used to compose the CAN waveform.
> >>> +- compatible : Should be "fsl,flexcan" and optionally
> >>> +               "fsl,flexcan-<processor>"
> >>
> >> fsl,<processor>-flexcan, and it should not be optional, and should come
> >> before "fsl,flexcan".
> >>
> >> Also may want to list fsl,p1010-rdb as a "canonical compatible" for
> >> anything which is backwards compatible with p1010's implementation.
> > 
> > How do I specify 'canonical compatible'?
> 
> Something like:
> 
>   compatible: Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan".
> 
>   An implementation should also claim any of the following compatibles
>   that it is fully backwards compatible with:
> 
>   - fsl,p1010-rdb

I am so confused.  fsl,p1010-flexcan refers, in my mind at least, to
a particular chiplet on the p1010 freescale processor.  fsl,p1010-rdb
would mean nothing to me as that is a p1010 processor with two flexcan
chiplets wired to a pair of DB-9 jacks.  For the driver, what additional
information is being conveyed?

Let's cut to the chase.  Here is what I have after incorporating your
earlier comment about the compatible line.  Please mark this up to
exactly what you are asking for.

Thanks,
Robin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flexcan CAN contoller on Freescale's ARM and PowerPC processors

Required properties:

- compatible : Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan"
- reg : Offset and length of the register set for this device
- interrupts : Interrupt tuple for this device

Example:

  can@...00 {
          compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan";
          reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
          interrupts = <48 0x2>;
          interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
  };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html