[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <j2dnte$p7a$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 V2] bonding:reset backup and inactive flag of
slave
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:57:35 +0800, Weiping Pan wrote:
> Eduard Sinelnikov (eduard.sinelnikov@...il.com) found that if we change
> bonding mode from active backup to round robin, some slaves are still
> keeping "backup", and won't transmit packets.
>
> As Jay Vosburgh(fubar@...ibm.com) pointed out that we can work around
> that by removing the bond_is_active_slave() check, because the "backup"
> flag is only meaningful for active backup mode.
>
> But if we just simply ignore the bond_is_active_slave() check, the
> transmission will work fine, but we can't maintain the correct value of
> "backup" flag for each slaves, though it is meaningless for other mode
> than active backup.
>
> I'd like to reset "backup" and "inactive" flag in bond_open, thus we can
> keep the correct value of them.
>
> As for bond_is_active_slave(), I'd like to prepare another patch to
> handle it.
>
> V2:
> Use C style comment.
> Move read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock). Replace restore with reset, for
> active backup mode, it means "restore", but for other modes, it means
> "reset".
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiping Pan <panweiping3@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists