[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110817.201219.1929019096173738026.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 V2] bonding:reset backup and inactive flag of
slave
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:57:35 +0800, Weiping Pan wrote:
>
>> Eduard Sinelnikov (eduard.sinelnikov@...il.com) found that if we change
>> bonding mode from active backup to round robin, some slaves are still
>> keeping "backup", and won't transmit packets.
>>
>> As Jay Vosburgh(fubar@...ibm.com) pointed out that we can work around
>> that by removing the bond_is_active_slave() check, because the "backup"
>> flag is only meaningful for active backup mode.
>>
>> But if we just simply ignore the bond_is_active_slave() check, the
>> transmission will work fine, but we can't maintain the correct value of
>> "backup" flag for each slaves, though it is meaningless for other mode
>> than active backup.
>>
>> I'd like to reset "backup" and "inactive" flag in bond_open, thus we can
>> keep the correct value of them.
>>
>> As for bond_is_active_slave(), I'd like to prepare another patch to
>> handle it.
>>
>> V2:
>> Use C style comment.
>> Move read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock). Replace restore with reset, for
>> active backup mode, it means "restore", but for other modes, it means
>> "reset".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Weiping Pan <panweiping3@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists