[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110831175849.328192b8@alice>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:58:49 +0200
From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>
To: "Vlad Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dmitry Kravkov" <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
"Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>,
"mirqus@...il.com" <mirqus@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bnx2x: remove TPA_ENABLE_FLAG
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:16:30 +0300 Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 August 2011 18:00:34 Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > if (bnx2x_reload) {
> > - if (bp->recovery_state == BNX2X_RECOVERY_DONE)
> > + if (bp->recovery_state == BNX2X_RECOVERY_DONE) {
> > + /*
> > + * Cheat! Normally dev->features will be
> > set after we
> > + * return, but that's too late. We need to
> > know how to
> > + * configure the NIC when reloading it, so
> > update
> > + * the features early.
> > + */
> > + dev->features = features;
> > return bnx2x_reload_if_running(dev);
>
> NACK
>
> This is bogus - what if bnx2x_reload_if_running(dev)
> (bnx2x_nic_load()) failes? The original dev->features would be
> lost...
Well, yes, but since the NIC would be now not working, do we really
care about its features? :-)
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists