[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110910.143046.520109083086760748.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:30:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fthain@...egraphics.com.au
Cc: linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macmace: disable only the dma interrupt
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:02:16 +1000 (EST)
> Don't disable all interrupts, just disable the relevant one.
>
> Also move a couple of printk calls outside of local_irq_save/restore.
>
> Tested on a Quadra 660av.
>
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Using disable_irq() is very expensive, and when done from an interrupt
handler can deadlock especially on SMP (which I understand might not
be relevant here).
I really can't see why you'd do things this way, especially since
interrupt handlers under Linux now unconditionally always run with cpu
interrupts disabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists