[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1109111958310.2745@nippy.intranet>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:02:17 +1000 (EST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macmace: disable only the dma interrupt
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, David Miller wrote:
> From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:02:16 +1000 (EST)
>
> > Don't disable all interrupts, just disable the relevant one.
> >
> > Also move a couple of printk calls outside of local_irq_save/restore.
> >
> > Tested on a Quadra 660av.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
>
> Using disable_irq() is very expensive, and when done from an interrupt
> handler can deadlock especially on SMP (which I understand might not be
> relevant here).
>
> I really can't see why you'd do things this way, especially since
> interrupt handlers under Linux now unconditionally always run with cpu
> interrupts disabled.
I wasn't aware of this (I was under the impression that a higher priority
interrupt could be serviced). Please disregard this patch.
Finn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists