[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110921125905.GI1966@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:59:05 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, patches@...aro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net/fec: change phy-reset-gpio request warning
to debug message
> > I agree that keeping it int is way better. But why not add it now to
> > keep things proper and tested? If this patch gets accepted as it is and
> > later someone else will add error checking to the caller, your platform
> > will lose FEC support as a regression.
> >
> Again, fec_reset_phy() failure is not a show-stopper. We might not
> want to make the probe fail because of that.
That would be an argument to make the function returning void?
Well, I still think something like
/* No phy reset configured */
if (phy_reset == -ENODEV)
return 0;
might be cleaner, yet I don't have the setup to test such an approach.
So, I'll be quiet now and hope for no problems.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists