[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110921131838.GJ28907@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:18:39 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
CC: <patches@...aro.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net/fec: change phy-reset-gpio request warning to
debug message
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > I agree that keeping it int is way better. But why not add it now to
> > > keep things proper and tested? If this patch gets accepted as it is and
> > > later someone else will add error checking to the caller, your platform
> > > will lose FEC support as a regression.
> > >
> > Again, fec_reset_phy() failure is not a show-stopper. We might not
> > want to make the probe fail because of that.
>
> That would be an argument to make the function returning void?
>
Hmm, it seems to be. Ok, will send v3 to return void.
Regards,
Shawn
> Well, I still think something like
>
> /* No phy reset configured */
> if (phy_reset == -ENODEV)
> return 0;
>
> might be cleaner, yet I don't have the setup to test such an approach.
>
> So, I'll be quiet now and hope for no problems.
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists