[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110927.013247.336618301904552114.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:32:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jonathan@....us
Cc: venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDSRDMA: Fix cleanup of rds_iw_mr_pool
From: Jonathan Lallinger <jonathan@....us>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:41:01 -0500
> @@ -548,6 +550,7 @@ static int rds_iw_flush_mr_pool(struct rds_iw_mr_pool *pool, int free_all)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->list_lock, flags);
> }
>
> + atomic_sub(unpinned, &poll->free_pinned);
> atomic_sub(ncleaned, &pool->dirty_count);
> atomic_sub(nfreed, &pool->item_count);
>
net/rds/iw_rdma.c: In function ‘rds_iw_flush_mr_pool’:
net/rds/iw_rdma.c:553:24: error: ‘poll’ undeclared (first use in this function)
net/rds/iw_rdma.c:553:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
If you didn't even build test it, I know you didn't test it's
functionality either.
This is crazy.
Well if it's not important enough to even build test this change
before you post it, then it obviously doesn't matter if the RDMA
module crashes the kernel when it's unloaded.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists