netdev - Re: [PATCH] RDSRDMA: Fix cleanup of rds_iw_mr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E82075B.9000003@opengridcomputing.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:26:51 -0500
From:	Jonathan Lallinger <jonathan@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDSRDMA: Fix cleanup of rds_iw_mr_pool

Hello David,

I am ashamed I made the same mistake twice. This happened because I had 
two git trees (I made a second one when kernel.org went down based off 
the github remote). I fixed, built, and ran several tests on the patch, 
and then sent the wrong patch from an old git tree (which was never 
build tested).

I can assure you I have a working patch, and it has been tested by the 
QA group at Chelsio and it builds/runs but there are still additional 
bugs in rds. So once I resolve those I will resend the correct patch 
with some additional fixes.

I am sorry about this and it won't happen again.

Thanks,
  Jonathan

David Miller wrote:
> From: Jonathan Lallinger <jonathan@....us>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:41:01 -0500
>
>   
>> @@ -548,6 +550,7 @@ static int rds_iw_flush_mr_pool(struct rds_iw_mr_pool *pool, int free_all)
>>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->list_lock, flags);
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	atomic_sub(unpinned, &poll->free_pinned);
>>  	atomic_sub(ncleaned, &pool->dirty_count);
>>  	atomic_sub(nfreed, &pool->item_count);
>>  
>>     
>
> net/rds/iw_rdma.c: In function ‘rds_iw_flush_mr_pool’:
> net/rds/iw_rdma.c:553:24: error: ‘poll’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> net/rds/iw_rdma.c:553:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>
> If you didn't even build test it, I know you didn't test it's
> functionality either.
>
> This is crazy.
>
> Well if it's not important enough to even build test this change
> before you post it, then it obviously doesn't matter if the RDMA
> module crashes the kernel when it's unloaded.
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html