[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111003.141841.1153259366783440647.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:18:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: willemb@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] make PACKET_STATISTICS getsockopt report consistently
between ring and non-ring
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:38:28 -0400
> This is a minor change.
>
> Up until kernel 2.6.32, getsockopt(fd, SOL_PACKET, PACKET_STATISTICS,
> ...) would return total and dropped packets since its last invocation. The
> introduction of socket queue overflow reporting [1] changed drop
> rate calculation in the normal packet socket path, but not when using a
> packet ring. As a result, the getsockopt now returns different statistics
> depending on the reception method used. With a ring, it still returns the
> count since the last call, as counts are incremented in tpacket_rcv and
> reset in getsockopt. Without a ring, it returns 0 if no drops occurred
> since the last getsockopt and the total drops over the lifespan of
> the socket otherwise. The culprit is this line in packet_rcv, executed
> on a drop:
>
> drop_n_acct:
> po->stats.tp_drops = atomic_inc_return(&sk->sk_drops);
>
> As it shows, the new drop number it taken from the socket drop counter,
> which is not reset at getsockopt. I put together a small example
> that demonstrates the issue [2]. It runs for 10 seconds and overflows
> the queue/ring on every odd second. The reported drop rates are:
> ring: 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, ...
> non-ring: 0, 15, 0, 30, 0, 46, 0, 60, 0 , 74.
>
> Note how the even ring counts monotonically increase. Because the
> getsockopt adds tp_drops to tp_packets, total counts are similarly
> reported cumulatively. Long story short, reinstating the original code, as
> the below patch does, fixes the issue at the cost of additional per-packet
> cycles. Another solution that does not introduce per-packet overhead
> is be to keep the current data path, record the value of sk_drops at
> getsockopt() at call N in a new field in struct packetsock and subtract
> that when reporting at call N+1. I'll be happy to code that, instead,
> it's just more messy.
>
> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/35665/
> [2] http://kernel.googlecode.com/files/test-packetsock-getstatistics.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks a lot for fixing this bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists