[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317764133.2751.13.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:35:33 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Eduardo Panisset <eduardo.panisset@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Application brokne due to XFRMA_ALG_AUTH_TRUNC
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 18:08 -0300, Eduardo Panisset wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have an application compiled against kernel 2.6.32 and which is
> using XFRMA_MARK (value 20).
It was not defined in 2.6.32. Perhaps you are using a distribution that
backported this feature incorrectly?
> However the same aplication does not work anymore on kernel 2.6.38.8
> due to XFRMA_MARK has now the value 21 because of a new attribute
> XFRMA_ALG_AUTH_TRUNC inserted before it in the file linux/xfrm.h.
> Now the only solution would be recompiling this application. Is
> correct introducing a new parameter in the middle of an existing enum
> in the kernel headers ?
So far as I can see, in mainline Linux versions the value has always
been 21.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists