lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8CBBD6.3080500@candelatech.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:19:34 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv4 multicast and mac-vlans acting weird on 3.0.4+

On 10/05/2011 01:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 13:09 -0700, Ben Greear a écrit :
>> On 10/05/2011 12:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 09:46 -0700, Ben Greear a écrit :
>>>> This is on a hacked 3.0.4 kernel...
>>>>
>>>> I am seeing an issue where an IPv4 mcast receiver will not receive
>>>> a 1473 or larger byte mcast message, but will receive a 1472.  The difference
>>>> being that 1473 ends up being two packets on the wire.  It works on
>>>> 802.1Q VLANs, VETH interfaces and real Ethernet.  It does not work
>>>> on a mac-vlan hanging off the VETH.
>>>>
>>>> I see packets received on the macvlan in tshark, and they appear correct.  No
>>>> obvious errors in the macvlan port stats or netstat -s,
>>>> and the 'ss' tool doesn't appear to support UDP sockets at all.
>>>>
>>>> So, I'm about to go digging into the code, but if anyone has any
>>>> suggestions for places to look, please let me know!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, problem is defragmentation and macvlan cooperation.
>>>
>>> Multicast messages are broadcasted on all macvlan ports.
>>>
>>> But IP defrag will probably deliver a single final frame.
>>>
>>> We probably need to handle defrag in macvlan before broadcasting to all
>>> ports.
>>
>> I see packets get to this code in ip_input.c (line 467 or so),
>> and that printk is mine of course.
>>
>> 	if ((dev&&  strcmp(dev->name, "rddVR10#0") == 0) ||
>> 	    (dev&&  strcmp(dev->name, "rddVR10") == 0)) {
>> 		printk("calling ip_rcv_finish through NF_HOOK, dev: %s, len: %i\n",
>> 		       dev->name, skb->len);
>> 	}
>>
>> 	return NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING, skb, dev, NULL,
>> 		       ip_rcv_finish);
>>
>> But, the macvlan packets never make it to the ip_rcv_finish method.
>>
>> I do see a big and a little packet entering this code.
>>
>> I have no firewall rules that I'm aware of, though there
>> is some conn-track logic (though not associated with the
>> mac-vlan interface):
>
> Say you have 10 vlans on your eth0, how many times do you want one
> incoming multicast frame being delivered to your application listening
> on 0.0.0.0:port ?

How would it work for two Ethernet devices on the same LAN?  I'd
say that mac-vlans should mimic that case.

And in my case, I'm binding hard to a device & IP address,
so my app should get it once regardless.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ