[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317846693.3457.11.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:31:33 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv4 multicast and mac-vlans acting weird on 3.0.4+
Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 13:19 -0700, Ben Greear a écrit :
> On 10/05/2011 01:17 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 13:09 -0700, Ben Greear a écrit :
> >> On 10/05/2011 12:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 09:46 -0700, Ben Greear a écrit :
> >>>> This is on a hacked 3.0.4 kernel...
> >>>>
> >>>> I am seeing an issue where an IPv4 mcast receiver will not receive
> >>>> a 1473 or larger byte mcast message, but will receive a 1472. The difference
> >>>> being that 1473 ends up being two packets on the wire. It works on
> >>>> 802.1Q VLANs, VETH interfaces and real Ethernet. It does not work
> >>>> on a mac-vlan hanging off the VETH.
> >>>>
> >>>> I see packets received on the macvlan in tshark, and they appear correct. No
> >>>> obvious errors in the macvlan port stats or netstat -s,
> >>>> and the 'ss' tool doesn't appear to support UDP sockets at all.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, I'm about to go digging into the code, but if anyone has any
> >>>> suggestions for places to look, please let me know!
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Well, problem is defragmentation and macvlan cooperation.
> >>>
> >>> Multicast messages are broadcasted on all macvlan ports.
> >>>
> >>> But IP defrag will probably deliver a single final frame.
> >>>
> >>> We probably need to handle defrag in macvlan before broadcasting to all
> >>> ports.
> >>
> >> I see packets get to this code in ip_input.c (line 467 or so),
> >> and that printk is mine of course.
> >>
> >> if ((dev&& strcmp(dev->name, "rddVR10#0") == 0) ||
> >> (dev&& strcmp(dev->name, "rddVR10") == 0)) {
> >> printk("calling ip_rcv_finish through NF_HOOK, dev: %s, len: %i\n",
> >> dev->name, skb->len);
> >> }
> >>
> >> return NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING, skb, dev, NULL,
> >> ip_rcv_finish);
> >>
> >> But, the macvlan packets never make it to the ip_rcv_finish method.
> >>
> >> I do see a big and a little packet entering this code.
> >>
> >> I have no firewall rules that I'm aware of, though there
> >> is some conn-track logic (though not associated with the
> >> mac-vlan interface):
> >
> > Say you have 10 vlans on your eth0, how many times do you want one
> > incoming multicast frame being delivered to your application listening
> > on 0.0.0.0:port ?
>
> How would it work for two Ethernet devices on the same LAN? I'd
> say that mac-vlans should mimic that case.
>
> And in my case, I'm binding hard to a device & IP address,
> so my app should get it once regardless.
>
OK, but before frame being delivered to your app, it must be
re-assembled by net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c & net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
machinery.
This machinery uses :
static int ip4_frag_match(struct inet_frag_queue *q, void *a)
{
struct ipq *qp;
struct ip4_create_arg *arg = a;
qp = container_of(q, struct ipq, q);
return qp->id == arg->iph->id &&
qp->saddr == arg->iph->saddr &&
qp->daddr == arg->iph->daddr &&
qp->protocol == arg->iph->protocol &&
qp->user == arg->user;
}
All frames broadcasted (because of multicast code in macvlan) on vlans
have same saddr/daddr/protocol (and user).
So kernel will discard all redundant copies of frames and deliver one
copy only to upper stack.
Check commit 7736d33f4262d437c5 (packet: Add pre-defragmentation support
for ipv4 fanouts) for a possible hint :
We could perform the re-assembly in macvlan code, before doing the
"broadcast the frame on all ports" part.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists