lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111007.133356.489094996618032061.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:33:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	johannes@...solutions.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: remove erroneous sk null assignment in timestamping

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:11:41 +0200

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> 
> skb->sk is obviously required to be non-NULL
> when we get into skb_complete_tx_timestamp().
> sock_queue_err_skb() will call skb_orphan()
> first thing which sets skb->sk = NULL itself.
> This may crash if the skb is still charged to
> the socket (skb->destructor is sk_wfree).
> 
> The assignment here thus seems to not only be
> pointless (due to the skb_orphan() call) but
> also dangerous (due to the crash).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

It looks like skb_clone_tx_timestamp() sets clone->sk without any
proper refcounting, so I bet this NULL'ing it out is working
around that bug.

The TX side of this infrastructure seems very poorly tested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ