[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318009222.3988.28.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:40:22 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: remove erroneous sk null assignment in timestamping
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 13:33 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:11:41 +0200
>
> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> >
> > skb->sk is obviously required to be non-NULL
> > when we get into skb_complete_tx_timestamp().
> > sock_queue_err_skb() will call skb_orphan()
> > first thing which sets skb->sk = NULL itself.
> > This may crash if the skb is still charged to
> > the socket (skb->destructor is sk_wfree).
> >
> > The assignment here thus seems to not only be
> > pointless (due to the skb_orphan() call) but
> > also dangerous (due to the crash).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
>
> It looks like skb_clone_tx_timestamp() sets clone->sk without any
> proper refcounting, so I bet this NULL'ing it out is working
> around that bug.
You're right. But this bug can actually trigger another way: The only
user of this is dp83640_txtstamp() which might do kfree_skb() on this
skb, in which case that'll likely crash trying to clean up the sk.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists