[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318009644.3988.33.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:47:24 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: remove erroneous sk null assignment in timestamping
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 19:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > It looks like skb_clone_tx_timestamp() sets clone->sk without any
> > proper refcounting, so I bet this NULL'ing it out is working
> > around that bug.
>
> You're right. But this bug can actually trigger another way: The only
> user of this is dp83640_txtstamp() which might do kfree_skb() on this
> skb, in which case that'll likely crash trying to clean up the sk.
Not only that -- I don't even see what causes the socket to not go away
while we're waiting for the ts_work that dp83640_txtstamp() fires off to
run.
And actually, no, this is all wrong. It shouldn't kick off ts_work
anyway, ts_work only handles *RX* timestamps, never *TX*. The *TX*
timestamps are handled by decode_txts() which is called when we receive
a TXTS frame from the device... *that* dequeues the skb from tx_queue
there.
I'm afraid as is this is terminally broken. I don't have a device with a
dp83640 PHY, but I bet you can cause kernel crashes by doing something
like
while (1)
fd = open()
enable tx timestamping on fd;
send(fd, frame)
close(fd);
I don't even think any of this is privileged.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists