netdev - Re: e100 + VLANs?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E943CF7.6030905@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date:	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:56:23 +0400
From:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: e100 + VLANs?

11.10.2011 16:04, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 11 octobre 2011 à 15:59 +0400, Michael Tokarev a écrit :
[]
>> (and it works).  With -s 1469, no ICMP packets can be seen
>> on e100 side.
>>
>> So it still may be the hardware... :)
>
> Yes, my patch was not needed, I was not sure sizeof(struct rfd) was
> included or not in the rfd.size setting (apparently its not needed)

Ok, good to know!

> Any counters increase in "ethtool -S eth0" ?

None at all.  Number of interrupts gets increased by 2 about every
2 seconds, even when the other side is doing ping -f, or not pinging
at all.

So it looks like the card merely ignores these packets.

So little result for so much efforts... :(

But it is not really that bad I think - it is an obsolete hardware.

Thank you for all the help!

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html