[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111024.191651.693676079385155765.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: richardcochran@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dp83640: use proper function to free transmit
time stamping packets
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:47:25 +0200
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:55:55AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
>> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:49:16 +0200
>>
>> > The previous commit enforces a new rule for handling the cloned packets
>> > for transmit time stamping. These packets must not be freed using any other
>> > function than skb_complete_tx_timestamp. This commit fixes the one and only
>> > driver using this API.
>> >
>> > The driver first appeared in v3.0.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>
>> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>>
>> In the 'net' tree, which is where you should be targetting these dp83640
>> driver patches, the code looks nothing like what you're patching against.
>>
>> Please respin patches #2 and #3 against current sources.
>
> Okay, but #2 will conflict with
>
> dccaa9e0 dp83640: add time stamp insertion for sync messages
>
> in net-next. Should I also submit a fix for that one?
Ok. I'll just apply those original 2 patches to net-next since Linus
release 3.1 today already.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists