lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:47:25 +0200 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, johannes@...solutions.net, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dp83640: use proper function to free transmit time stamping packets On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:55:55AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> > Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:49:16 +0200 > > > The previous commit enforces a new rule for handling the cloned packets > > for transmit time stamping. These packets must not be freed using any other > > function than skb_complete_tx_timestamp. This commit fixes the one and only > > driver using this API. > > > > The driver first appeared in v3.0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at> > > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> > > In the 'net' tree, which is where you should be targetting these dp83640 > driver patches, the code looks nothing like what you're patching against. > > Please respin patches #2 and #3 against current sources. Okay, but #2 will conflict with dccaa9e0 dp83640: add time stamp insertion for sync messages in net-next. Should I also submit a fix for that one? Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists