[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024174724.GA1954@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:47:25 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dp83640: use proper function to free transmit
time stamping packets
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:55:55AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:49:16 +0200
>
> > The previous commit enforces a new rule for handling the cloned packets
> > for transmit time stamping. These packets must not be freed using any other
> > function than skb_complete_tx_timestamp. This commit fixes the one and only
> > driver using this API.
> >
> > The driver first appeared in v3.0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>
> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>
> In the 'net' tree, which is where you should be targetting these dp83640
> driver patches, the code looks nothing like what you're patching against.
>
> Please respin patches #2 and #3 against current sources.
Okay, but #2 will conflict with
dccaa9e0 dp83640: add time stamp insertion for sync messages
in net-next. Should I also submit a fix for that one?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists